Organizing money is critical to organizing a movement. This is especially important for media funding, because it is difficult to find. These materials might be helpful in successfully winning media funding for social change.
Media Funding for Social
Change
In 2003, I produced this report to examine the question of Who Funds
Social Change Media? It was
commissioned by the MediaWorks Project, a group of collaborative funder, to:
§
Explore the
attitudes of funders, especially social change funders, toward media in general
and the projects they support in particular.
§
Identify the
types of media projects being supported, especially by social change funders.
§
Ascertain if
funders thought media was having an impact on other issues being funded.
§
Assess the
degree of interest in more education and support to increase media funding.
The Findings
Many of the findings were expected, but some were
surprising.
§
At the time, only
about 700 foundations make grants in the category of media and communications -- slightly more than 1% of all
foundation.
§
The aggregate
annual media and communications giving was roughly $ 4 billion +, in a context of general foundation grants totaling
more than $ 30 billion.
§
There was a
VERY wide range of projects funded in this category -- everything from
independent film production and policy research, to scholarships and journalism
programs.
§
The largest
proportion of funding went to public radio and television, primarily to local
stations.
§
Many
foundations also supported strategic communications, p.r. and 'messaging' for
grantee groups and issues, journalism programs, and development communications.
§
Most funding
goes to producing content. Technology,
organizing, new media and policy issues have far fewer supporters.
§
By and large,
alternative, progressive and independent media projects were not major
beneficiaries.
§
Many
foundations are funding media as part of other program areas or embedded in
larger projects. Projects ranging from
training and educational videos to community newspapers are funded this way. Funders do not consider this to be "funding media."
§
Youth funding
seems especially supportive of funding media, where it is seen as part of a
core organizing strategy.
§
Funders are
generally satisfied with the media projects they are supporting, but there is
little evaluation of most media projects.
Many foundations do not know how to assess their impact or
effectiveness.
§
Funders do not
always see their media projects fitting into their own strategic funding goals.
Instead, media projects are considered 'stand alone' and not tied to other
program goals.
§
Funders do not
see media activism as a coherent 'sector.'
They don't know how to recognize which are key priorities, and they
don't understand how the many disparate issues on the media agenda are
connected.
§
There are a
number of collaborative efforts that advocate for more funding, from
established groups like G-FEM (Grantmakers in Film and Electronic Media) to new
groups focusing on technology and media policy.
Conclusions
Based on the overall picture that emerged, the
study drew the following conclusions.
§
Whether or not
their own institution supports media projects, respondents had nearly unanimous
agreement that organizing around media
issues right now is critical.
§
Even so, foundation funding is not catching up to
the rapid changes in the current media environment. Funders don't have the 'silos' for responding
to the radical changes underway.
§
Funders want to be educated about the issues in the broader media landscape and learn about
relevant projects. They are looking for
a handle to understand the 'big picture.'
§
By and large, foundations are not clear about political
strategies that work through media,
and those that work on media. They
want to understand how various approaches work and what grantee groups are
trying to accomplish.
§
The message
from funders is that media support should
function as "part of an overall social change strategy."
§
Funders would like tools to evaluate these
projects. They want help judging the effectiveness and
impact of what they are supporting.
While
the media landscape is having a fast-growing impact on groups engaged in social
change, funders have not kept up. In
addition, they have been slow to recognize the emergence of a number of media
and communications issues as being important in and of themselves, especially
in a globalized, interconnected world.
Helping
the foundation community understand these critical developments would go a long
way towards increasing support for media-related projects and strengthening
groups grappling with the larger social justice issues effected by these
changes.
$ $ $ $ $ $